The Author

Visit my personal site: ProdigalPaul.com

_________________________

[NOTE:  What lies below is very old, and I intend to change it sometime soon (3/6/2009)]

I hope in this page to provide a framework to anyone that may read this as to the preconceived notions, dispositions, belief systems, and worldviews I am speaking from, as these are the necessary filters through which everything I say will pass through. I plan on using standardized categorizations to accomplish this so hopefully anyone that stumbles upon this blog will be able to get the proper perspective of me, no matter there preconceived notions. Before I get to that, though, I’ll briefly be personal.

I am currently a student at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, VA.  After I graduate this May, I am going to Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia to earn a Masters of Divinity in Pastoral Counseling.  Then, the plan is to return to VCU to earn my Doctorate of Counseling Psychology.

When it comes to the “thinking perspectives”, most people fall into one of three categories: philosopher, scholar, and scientist. Scientists need to prove things out in front of them in more concrete ways to draw conclusions. Scholars research what has been said and done before them in order to draw conclusions. Philosophers look at the world and through thinking and making connections draw conclusions. I am a philosopher-scholar. Philosopher, primarily as the bulk of this blog is dedicated to the conclusions I have seen, drawn out, applied, and seen connected in the world around me between the Bible and the human experience. Though this is my primary role, I am also a scholar to a certain extent. I have done (and continue to do) extensive research in the areas pertaining to “psychotheology” (primarily the “theology” part.) I love the Bible, the Word of God, and know it has the answer to every human need and it has objectively expressed to us why we have those needs, what fulfills them, and how they get that way. In short, I feel I am a scholar of the Bible (in the ongoing verb sense, not “positionally” as if I am an expert) and have only become this way not from analyzing the Bible, but letting it analyze me. I also read other books. Many, many other books. These books help integrate the Word of God into the world around me in certain ways that helps in forming my ideas on “psychotheology.”

My philosophical perspective is Biblical Pragmatism. The easiest way to describe pragmatism is the view that “hey, whatever works, works.” For example: What psychological perspective is correct? Which ever one “works”in therapy and explains the greatest amount of human behavior. Now, the “biblical” part comes in the fact that I have seen and I believe the Bible testifies to the fact that it is what “works” in this world. My pragmatism always seems to support my Bible. That is not my standard, it is just reality. I don’t use my experience to validate the Bible; I use the Bible to validate my experiences. And you know what? That “works.” Every psychological thing that I have seen that “works” I see is supported and validated in the Bible. I then use this to look and see what more the Bible says in the context of this specific truth and helps broaden the scope of the psychological truth I initially observed. Be it a new application, the reason why it works, a broader scope, or narrower focus, the Bible continues to astonish me as it shows me how to be a counselor and how people work.

Psychologically, I am a cognitive-behaviorist.  More specifically, many of my ideas resonate witha Dr. William Glasser and his theoretical perspective known as “Choice Theory,” and its therapy component “Reality Therapy.”  While secular in most of its basic presuppositions (I wouldn’t call myself a Choice Theorist by any means), at its root is much truth concerning humans and responsibility as one of the keys to metal distress.  For more info on these topics, Google them or read a paper I wrote on Choice Theory compared to the most popular Marital Therapy used today. you can read that paper by clicking here.

Theologically, I historically come from a Southern Baptist background, but more recently, my theological doctrines have shifted somewhat. I consider myself a Reformed Evangelical Conservative-Charismatic Protestant. More specifically, I am a 6-point Calvinist, old-earth theologian, believer in the present full workings of the Holy Spirit, and believer that Salvation is given freely by God through faith alone in only Jesus and not of works. For more on these things, Google them, check out the links on the sidebar, or just read the Book of Romans. Better yet, just read your Bible.

I know this is long and very few will actually read it, but for the few that do, I thank you; and I hope, and pray, that it was an enlightening and fruitful journey through the necessary drudgery of presenting myself as open and honest and laid bare so everyone will know what is coming.

One Response to this post.

  1. What do the teachings of Freud and Jung have to do with Jesus rose from the dead? Nothing. Your doctrine of psychology is ever changing, Jesus the same yesterday, today, and forever. God bless the fools too Lord….

    Reply

Respond to this post